Evey year, in wide areas of West
Africa, from December to February or March, the harmattan season
descends, characterised by cooler temperatures, a dry dusty wind and
hazy skies. The dust, purportedly blown from the Sahara, is pervasive
and quickly becomes apparent to the naked eye on all exposed surfaces.
Solar panels, located outdoors, usually on difficult-to-reach rooftops,
are very susceptible to this. The effect is insidious by the very
nature of solar energy. Completely silent and effective through an
accumulation of energy over many hours rather than a sudden release
over minutes, solar panel output is difficult to monitor by the casual
observer, and a drop in output will often go unnoticed.
How much does an accumulation of Harmattan dust affect
solar output? I
set out to investigate on a late February day, cloudless but moderately
hazy. 100 Watt solar panels on my rooftop had
not been cleaned since the start of the Harmattan season, indeed since
the last downpour of the rainy season, possibly in November. Located in
Sierra Leone, 7.5 deg North of the equator, my panels are mounted flat
on my rooftop, on sloping, corrugated roofing
sheets, at azimuth angles of approximately 15 degrees. This is
technically not ideal, but for the purposes of ease of mounting least
troublesome.
During the investigation solar panel output was monitored over a period
of
time before, during and after the panels were cleaned with a soft cloth
and moderately soapy water. Output readings driven by computer software
were taken every 12 seconds and saved directly to an Excel spreadsheet.
The cleaning exercise lasted less than ten minutes, so change in
output due to the movement of the sun rather than to the cleaning would
have been small. Skies were cloudless, so any variation due to
cloud cover would have been small. However the effect
being measured, the effect of the dust that had already settled on the
panels, is separate from the effect on solar radiation of the general
Harmattan haze, which of course was still present.
A graph of solar output
versus time is shown. Readings were very
consistent before and after the cleaning and a significant rise
in output is observed. Solar
output monitored for several days before the cleaning and after the
cleaning confirm this pattern.
CONCLUSION: Based on these results I conclude that the effect of
settled Harmattan dust on output of uncleaned solar panels at the end
of the Harmattan season is of the order of a thirty percent reduction.